Oil Industry Confronts California’s Regulatory Environment | OilPrice.com

On October 16, 2024, the Phillips 66 dishwasher announced that it was coming stop the process at its Los Angeles-area refinery in the fourth quarter of 2025. The announcement came just days after California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a new law that imposes additional regulations on landfills. cleaning.

The closings will affect approximately 600 employees and 300 contractors currently working at the Los Angeles refinery. Politics report that the shutdown will affect 8% of the country’s already tight oil production.

Although Phillips 66 spokesman Al Ortiz denied in an email to Politics that the shutdown was a response to Newsom’s signing of the new law, California’s treatment of the oil industry was undoubtedly the cause.

The news follows the August 2024 announcement that Chevron, America’s second largest oil company, will move its headquarters from California to Texas. The company, which has roots in California since 1879, will move its headquarters to Houston in the next five years.

Chevron’s move comes as a response to California’s tougher laws and aggressive climate policies. Chevron CEO Mike Wirth expressed concern about the state’s business environment in an interview with The Wall Street Journal.

Wirth argued that California’s policies are harmful to consumers, discourage investment, and ultimately hurt the state’s economy. The relocation of such a prominent company highlights the growing tension between traditional energy firms and countries pursuing climate goals.

California Environmental Laws

Over the years, California has adopted the strictest fuel standards in the country. The state requires the production and sale of a special gasoline blend, known as California Reformulated Gasoline (CaRFG), which has stricter environmental standards than the federal blends used in many other states. This special design reduces the production of pollutants such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and sulfur, but is more expensive to clean, increasing the overall cost of gasoline.

California gasoline also has lower sulfur levels than the national average. Sulfur reduction is more expensive for cleaning products because it requires additional processing steps, leading to higher production costs that are passed on to consumers at the pump.

California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) requires gasoline manufacturers to reduce the carbon footprint of the fuel they sell. This could include blending more expensive biofuels, investing in cleaner production technologies, or buying credits from other companies to meet carbon reduction targets. The additional cost of LCFS compliance is reflected in the price of gasoline.

Under California’s Cap-and-Trade program, refiners and other major emitters of greenhouse gases must buy carbon credits to offset their emissions. These fees increase operating costs for refineries, which in turn raises the price of gasoline. Because this program is unique to California, it adds costs that refineries in other states don’t have to bear.

Unintended Consequences

California’s energy producers also have to comply with additional regulations, which are mainly designed to reduce pollution. However, there are costs associated with these strict regulations, and there have been unintended consequences.

Because of its unique fuel mix, the government cannot easily buy fuel from other regions in the event of a supply disruption. If a refinery is down due to repairs or an accident, it is difficult to get new fuel quickly from abroad because other regions do not produce the same gasoline blends. This limited supply situation can lead to price spikes in the event of disruptions, leading to volatility in fuel prices.

Those prices, in turn, could lead to higher profits for some state refiners. If one plant is taken offline for unscheduled maintenance, the fuel supply is suddenly reduced. That can cause price spikes or blackouts. Therefore, some refiners may see profits rise as fuel prices rise.

Although these price spikes were self-inflicted, California tried to correct the situation by suing the oil companies and passing additional laws that tried to prevent the rise of these prices. At the same time, California has destroyed its oil industry for years. This creates a hostile environment for these companies.

The future of California

Ultimately, California can pass whatever laws it wants regarding its oil industry, but these companies can also respond. That’s what Chevron, and Phillips 66, did.

California’s aggressive environmental laws and stringent oil industry regulations have created a difficult and challenging environment for energy companies operating in the state. While these measures aim to reduce emissions and combat climate change, they have also led to unintended consequences such as higher fuel prices, supply shortages, and strained relations with the oil industry.

Recent decisions made by major players such as Chevron and Phillips 66 to relocate or stop operations in California highlight the balance between environmental goals and economic considerations. As the government continues to pursue its strong climate plan, it may need to re-evaluate its approach to ensure a sustainable supply of energy and reduce the economic impact on consumers.

The ongoing exodus of oil companies from California serves as a warning to other states considering similar regulatory approaches, highlighting the need for a systematic approach that addresses environmental concerns and economic sustainability. .

These measures could further restrict California’s fuel supply, and likely lead to even higher prices for California consumers.

By Robert Rapier

More top information from Oilprice.com